One of my Year 9 classes was recently starting out on a new topic broadly covering Australia with their Social Studies teacher.
We decided together to team up. As their ICT teacher I gave the class an investigation using an ICT diagramming tool where, in groups, they would research and present to the rest of the students a diagram answering the broad question “What is Australia?”. There were constraints of course explained here in the SOLO Task description.
The satisfying outcome from this task was that, when each group explained to the class why they had added the content and linked ideas as they had, they were all completely different.
What is Australia? by Rishabh, Kaleb, Omar and Antoine (below) shows a wide range of content, well explained and easy for someone who knows little about Australia to absorb.
(Zoom in or Expand for easier viewing)
What is Australia? by Aidan, Kevin and Doug is another that shows a wider range of content, however their diagram demonstrates that you can give a lot more information in a simple and clearer way and colour, when used sparingly, can be highly effective.
What is Australia? by Finn D, Finn M, Jeffrey and Ronan has the group taking a very different approach. The diagram at first appears less visually appealing showing a narrower range of topics covered. However, a closer look at what they are saying demonstrates a deeper and higher level of understanding through their connections (by linking) within the diagram. They even make observations of irony when it comes to core values and rights of groups within Australia.
This task goes to show teaching can often be about giving students authentic and challenging tasks to extend their thinking. This, supported by great digital applications and good exemplars, means that the teacher’s role is to make them self available to guide and challenge the students as they work on the tasks. My students loved working on this task, both in class and at home, which makes Lucidchart a great collaborative and accessible tool to enhance teaching and learning. Remember, it’s the learning, stupid!
This year we have introduced SOLO Taxonomy across the school in an effort to get our students to change the way that they think and to better understand the way they learn. More information about SOLO can be found here.
I did some analysis of how my Year 10 (New Zealand 14/15 year old) Social Studies class in Term 1 (February-April) understood SOLO Taxonomy and surveyed them as to how they understood it to help improve their learning. The results were quite impressive.
Among other class references and tasks, I introduced SOLO into three specific larger tasks across the same Causes of WWII topic, two of which have already posted about:
The FIRST task was a Group Collaboration Inquiry Research Task presented in Lucidchart
The SECOND task was an Individual Research Assignment Task presented in Lucidpress
The THIRD was an End of Topic Moodle Forum Debate using students rating each others entries as described below:
Moodle LMS Forum Topic Debate using Student Ratings
First of all I prefer using Moodle Forum discussions as opposed to Facebook, Twitter or other formats of student topic discussion & debate. The reason for this is that, in my experience, students feel safe in this environment and it is clearly under the management of the school where we can set our own guidelines. That is, the Facebook “standards”, or in many cases lack of, can be left at the door and the students clearly understand this. Secondly, Moodle has many inbuilt tools which can be used in the forums which I will now explain.
I set up a some earlier forum discussions, leading up to the final forum, getting students to discuss/debate questions such as:
1. Who was to blame for World War One? (This was a good question because the students had already researched and built a diagram with lucidchart)
2. Was the Treaty of Versailles Fair or Unfair on Germany?
By the time of the 3rd Question, upon which the students had gained a better understanding of SOLO Taxonomy in the class/school, I added the TEACHER RATING ONLY function into the forum using SOLO Grading and enabled it so that all students could view what I graded each of them. I challenged the students to improve the quality of their arguments. Here is the question that I rated their arguments on:
3. Should/Could Hitler have been stopped at the Rhineland?
Students who received Multistructural were motivated to improve to a Relational argument. Those that received Relational were motivated to write an Extended Abstract argument. Everyone in the class were out to avoid a Unistructural argument. What I clearly observed, as compared to previous discussion entries, was a clear motivation by the students to research and write a better argument when debating online with each other. They were also looking at the merits of each others arguments more closely and better challenging each other
The next stage was to raise the stakes in the the final debate – Student Ratings:
I added the functionality for the students to be able to rate each others. I explained that it was a real privilege and took them through their understanding of what the SOLO ratings meant. To help, I placed the scale below in the debate instructions alongside the forum debate question (q.4 below). They were instructed to rate at least 5 other entries before they made their 2nd entry and they had to rate an entry before they replied to it. They were clearly instructed to rate the quality of the argument, whether or not they agreed or disagreed with it:
4. A simple question: “What caused World War Two?”
The students really responded and took the debate seriously. I have never seen such a high quality of analysis, debate and level of understanding from a Year 10 class of what essentially is or has been a Year 11 topic. Using SOLO Taxonomy, from my point of view, really did raise the level of motivation and understanding to new levels. BUT, enough of what I think, let us hear from the students…
Results of class student survey at the end of the topic using Google Forms
The students were asked to complete an extensive (up to 20 minute) survey on there understanding of SOLO Taxonomy.
One of a range of questions asked them to rate how useful SOLO Taxonomy as a tool had been for each of the three tasks mentioned at the beginning of this post. ie the group charting task, individual research task and the forum rating task. Here is a summary of their answers:
The most telling result here is that the majority of the students overwhelming rated SOLO Taxonomy as very useful in assisting them in the forum discussion debate. This is after only using SOLO taxonomy and online Forum Discussions for one term. That SOLO can be extended across to in class debates, and other in class or online activities is very powerful not to mention that it is a cross-curricular tool for teaching and learning.
Here is a link to my full report on the findings from my Teacher Inquiry into the impact of SOLO Taxonomy using a range of Blended E-Learning tasks in Year 10 Social Studies.
September 20th, 2014 in
, Google Apps
, Social Studies
, SOLO Taxonomy
| tags: Research
, solo taxonomy
A collaborative tool like Lucidchart enables students to easily research and share their creative ideas together, either at school, or online while at home. There are a number of charting and mindmapping tools out there, but Lucidchart impresses me as the easiest to use and collaborate with. Even better, as a Google Apps school, our students have Single-Sign-On and its integration with Google Docs/Drive is such that students can add and sync updated lucidchart diagrams straight into their Google Documents. Fantastic stuff…it just keeps getting better.
At the start of this year, for their 20th Century History topic, my class of Year 10 Social Studies students were given the task to: Create and present to your class a diagram answering the question: “What Caused World War One?”
Groups were given resources such as a video to watch but from there it was left entirely up to them. Given a simple, accessible and reliable tool in Lucidchart, students were able to develop their inquiry, research and collaborative skills and even show some artistic flair. Often as teachers we feed the students too much information and do not trust them enough to find the information out themselves. Given a well constructed task these students really enjoyed the task of co-creating the knowledge. At the end of the task the students presented their diagrams to the class and explained WHY they had constructed their diagram and made the connections and emphasised the particular information they had.
Here is the SOLO assessment marking schedule
Student groups were named after World War II leaders for the duration of the topic.
This diagram by team Zhukov is particularly creative and impressive where the numerous linking which shows real understanding of causes relationships told in a nice simple way, by a group of 14/15 years olds doing their own research:
Other Groups work shown here:
Team Montgomery – Causes of WWI
Team Freyberg – Causes of WWI
September 19th, 2014 in
, Cool Tools
, Google Apps
, SOLO Taxonomy
| tags: collaboration
, solo taxonomy
Well it has been a long time since I have posted on this blog, but that is not to say that I have not been busy and moving ahead with using a range of ICT’s in my role as Director of E-Learning at Palmerston North Boys’ High. Things have been moving very quickly for the school this year to the benefit of everyone and our new Moodle Page branded Stratus, though it still has a lot of development to go, has been very successful in helping to showcase to staff how web has so much potential in showcasing student work. It has also been a great site for acting as a Single-Sign-On facility for our main web learning apps which support learning. One of them which the students of my Social Studies class used this year is called Lucidpress which an online print and digital publishing software and is completely free for Education institutions.
All Year 10 Social Studies students are required to complete a research assignment for their Term One 20th Century History Topic.
The task for students in my Year 10 class was:
“You are a news reporter for a magazine of your choosing. You are to research, write and present a news magazine report on a significant battle of World War II which caused challenges to people”
Each report required:
- An Article about the background and reasons for the event
- An Article reporting from the location about the event
- An article about the leaders involved
- And an article about new innovations which impacted the event
This task was assessed using SOLO Taxonomy, which has proven very helpful for our students by challenging them to think about how they can move their thinking and learning to a higher level.
The full task description can be found here
Other Year 10 Class Publications well worth viewing are:
The Battle of The River Plate – by Curtis Rutland
The Battle of Midway – by Matthew O’Leary
The Battle of Nanjing – by Joe Ryan
The Battle of Crete – by Anson Price
At the end of 2011 I had left my position as e-Learning Director at Wellington College and during 2012 worked as an e-Learning consultant and trainer to a number of schools and e-Learning PD clusters around New Zealand. It was a stimulating year where , having visiting a range of schools, I have been able to observe how different schools have faces similar challenges and adopted a range of approaches to enhance their e-Learning capabilities to advance teaching and learning. This has been informative for me having only taught at the one school during my teaching career until now. Another thing this year has illuminated for me is that I do miss the classroom and the community of the school environment. I now look forward to a new challenge in 2013 and am taking up the position of Director of e-Learning at Palmerston North Boys’ High School. This is a school with a proud tradition, committed and enthusiastic staff and fantastic boys. Their motto “Nihil Boni Sine Labore” which translates to “Nothing achieved without hard work” is something which I firmly aspire to and so look forward to making a positive impact on the school over the coming years.
From what I have learnt over the last 2-3 years experience and as I look ahead to 2013 I have come to the conclusion that for a school to move ahead with their e-Learning capability they need to recognise the needs of the modern connected learner. My thoughts are summed up in the 4 points below:
- The internet has transformed learning
- There needs to be appropriate learning tools and a support infrastructure in place
- The role of the teacher needs to change
- Pedagogy is at the heart of the use of technologies
1. The internet has transformed learning
The internet has transformed the ways by which learners’ access information and our schools and their teachers must respond or they will become irrelevant. Teachers with their specialist subject expertise are no longer the only sources of knowledge. Where teaching used to be about filling up our students as empty vessels with knowledge and then testing their retention, we must now explore new ways of thinking about teaching and learning. Individual students need to be given challenges and opportunities to pursue relevant answers to questions themselves and to develop life-long learning capabilities as well as subject knowledge. Schools will become more relevant by showing adaptability to this new world of the way that we access and share information. But before this can happen…
2. There needs to be appropriate learning tools and a support infrastructure in place
Teachers and Learners need to not only be well connected but also be provisioned with well-chosen tools that enable genuine collaboration, communication, creativity and innovation – ie to open up new and different ways of learning to occur (p36 NZ Curriculum). Learning tools should be cloud-based and low or zero cost to enable easy access for all students from anywhere and at any time. The ICT infrastructure must be an enabler, rather than a disabler which can frustrate and impede progress – teaching & learning, as opposed to administration, management or other, must be the priority when choosing tools. Student devices (BYOD) are now not an option but are an essential component for students to access their online tools to enable their ability to learn from anywhere and at anytime. Their devices should work seamlessly at school and from home. With appropriate learning tools and infrastructure in place…
3. The role of the teacher needs to change
With the changing role of the teacher, we have never been more important with the best of us being continuous learners who operate within the strong disciplinary framework of our subject areas1. We are living in a technologically fast changing world where, as teachers, we need to be models of adaptability to our students. Good schools create the professional space for genuine teacher reflection and learning and acknowledge and support teachers who are at different stages. They also give the space and permission to teachers to take acceptable risks to explore new approaches in a supportive environment. In short, a teacher needs to become a modern connected learner himself/herself and embrace the tools and see the potential of how they can open up new and different ways of learning in their curriculum area or year level. Until they do that, little will change. With this in mind it is important to remember that…
4. Pedagogy is at the heart of the use of technologies
Learning tools should be utilised purposefully with individual teachers having clearly stated and well understood learning objectives when choosing an ICT tool2 to meet a particular learning need. In other words, teachers have a clear understanding of why they are using a tool. Students are being given authentic and challenging tasks to extend their thinking skills and ability to cope in an increasingly complex and connected world of growing information, multiple ideas and perspectives and with the increasing need to communicate and collaborate effectively. Teachers’ disciplinary thinking is enabling students to critique the information and misinformation and to develop and construct their own knowledge and ideas with opportunities to present their work to authentic audiences. We have enabled the modern connected learner who is engaged in authentic tasks. Just remember, it’s the learning, stupid!
1Though directed more toward secondary teachers (subject specialist), could apply to primary teachers
2Choosing an ICT tool could equally mean choosing an activity or other tool within an LMS such as Moodle
I just had a reflective read through my e-fellow research report written in 2008 and was struck by how, four years later, the Blended Learning Model is so much more relevant today.
In 2008, using Moodle’s forum tool, I encouraged a Year 11 History class to interact with the course content through a blend of online and class discussion and debate. A rigorous analysis of the value of this was completed followed by conclusions about the value of the model for improving student learning.
Also consider that the class had yet to encounter the Moodle LMS (VLE) prior to the study and that this was pre-Facebook which did not enter the New Zealand teenage scene until sometime during 2009.
The reason I believe that we, as teachers, should be using discussion forums with our students is that this is the environment that students now live and are at their most comfortable – ie regular online discussion and chat. Students are happy to discuss, comment and debate in this medium so why not bring it into learning?
I have observed a lot of Moodle courses in a number of school environments with a range of resource and activity tools being used. My belief however, is that the most under-utilised tool, and the one that has the most potential to help improve student learning is the Moodle Forum.
Here is a link to my Blended E-Learning Research Report called “How can Student Interactivity be Enhanced through the use of a Blended Learning Approach?”
Last year my Year 9 History class was about to embark on their task of researching Old Boys from their school who fought in the First World War. The dual purpose of the topic was for these new entrants to learn about the history of their school, their country at the time and the battle fields of the War.
Having successfully challenged the class to use Google Docs to research and present the Ancient Rome topic, I decided to take it one step further and ask them if they would like to build a class website. This was a risky undertaking as it would require an already high level and difficult individual research task to be presented in a shared and co-ordinated approach. With some Web Design (Digital Technologies) teaching background I had confidence that I could assist a small team of enthusiastic students from within the class to help prepare and manage the technical aspects of the project.
The topic background was introduced over the last two weeks of Term Two with the full research and presentation project introduced and completed during Term Three of 2011. Here is the completed class website with each student completing and signing off at the bottom of their respective page. Their research was completed on a separate Google document template. On the website I have written here fully about how the research project was implemented along with some reflections. I also presented on it in a workshop at the U-learn teachers conference in October 2011.
Google Sites in Education are being increasingly used for School Extra-Curricular Sports and Arts – Club, Team and Group websites – a good example here used by the increasingly successful Wellington College Rowing Club. I have even seen Sites being implemented this year in interesting ways for student centred houses at Nayland College (Nelson). And of course many teachers and students have Google Sites for classes or student portfolios.
The way that I have utilised Google Sites here is to get students to take their research work to another level. To set their expectations higher and to teach them about:
- Research Quality and Standards
- Writing Content for the Web
- Web Presentation – Navigation and Consistency
- Teamwork – Collaboration and Communication
What I have come to appreciate is that the higher the level of expectation that I set for my students then the more they aspired to meet it. For example, the more prepared, well designed and professional the student web development team made the website template look when presented to the rest of the class, then the more the sense of expectation of a higher quality of work that the class aspired to.
Of course this was my first attempt and there are things that I would certainly do differently given another opportunity at this sort of task, but I definite enjoyed teaching in this student centred, inquiry focused and collaborative style and I know that my students enjoyed it and undoubtedly gained from the experience.
May 10th, 2012 in
, Cloud Computing
, Google Apps
| tags: blended learning
, Cloud Computing
, Google Apps
, Google Sites
, Web Design
Many schools looking to switch to Google Apps often ask about how they should manage the transition for their organisation, particularly offering support and training to staff and students.
The experience I had back in December 2009 when we transitioned Wellington College to Google Apps was made a lot easier by Google’s provision of a Google Apps Support Site Template. All I had to do was add the site template to our organisation and make a few modifications and provide a link. Google continually update the template as they regularly improve their Apps suite.
I have installed the site template here where you can follow instructions on how to install it into your education institution.
I find the training videos link particularly useful along with the “Learn by app” links. There are always new things to learn.
In my last year at Wellington College (2011) I had the pleasure of teaching a Year 9 History class and, as the school’s eLearning Director, was given plenty of freedom to explore diffent ways that eLearning tools could enhance and make learning history more relevant for the students. After only 4 weeks of regular teaching the new entrants were surprised when I told them that it was now there turn to take over.
(Note: class was mixed ability and Year 9 in New Zealand is age approx 12-13 at beginning February)
Collaboration Task Description
They were given the task, in pairs, to research and present to the class an aspect of the current topic: “Ancient Rome”. Google Docs was the chosen tool as our College had the previous year become a Google Apps for Education School and the tool enabled students to collaborate and work on their projects from home. They needed to work on a shared Doc to plan their research and presentation notes and to also work on a shared Google Presentation (PowerPoint) to present their topic to the class. Presentations were to be 10 minutes long and based around 3 focus questions which I the students were to develop for their chosen topics. You can see the full outline of the research and presentation project assessment task here.
As I only taught the class 2-3 times a week, the majority of the research needed to be completed as homework. The students did not have their own laptops or devices in class but we were able to book some time to access computers to learn how to use the Google Tools and to access the necessary online research materials. As this was the students first research task the assessment focus was mostly on the presentation rather than on the sourcing. While the research was completed over 5 weeks, we did still manage to watch the movie “Gladiator” and the fascinating Ancient Megastructures documentary on the Colosseum. The final 2 weeks were devoted to the presentations with 3 per lesson – the students booked themselves into the presentation slots via a shared Google Spreadsheet.
The Finished Product
Below are two of the presentations to give you an idea of the quality of what was produced. Presentation notes were printed by the students and each student was required to take an equal part in their presentation:
The full list of topics that were presented on is: Emperors, Architecture, Rome’s Greatest Enemy, Christianity, Gods, Expansion of the Empire, Gladiators, Army, Punishments, Technology, The Fall of Rome, Civilisation, Pompeii, Slaves, The Aqueducts – a reasonably extensive list. Most other presentations were just as outstanding in content with students wanting to maintain the quality of what they saw in the first round of presentations (Note: an exception was made for the Roman Emperors Project where the two students were given permission to not use research focus questions so they could maintain their creative theme).
This is the second time that I have done this collaborative research and presentation assessment task using Google Docs. What continues to amaze me is that the students absolutely love completing it despite the amount of work involved. When taught how to structure a presentation properly they learn a lot and also gain a great deal of confidence with many getting over their initial fear of presenting in front of others. Of course I enjoy it also as I see students engaged and enjoying learning and liking the subject that I have a passion for. It is also great to see their creativity and personalities coming to the fore in this type of task.
At the end of the year I conducted an extensive anonymous class survey (using Google Forms) on a number of questions related to the entire year. Three of the questions were specific to the task described above. 25 of the 30 students were present to take part in the survey – here are their responses:
The student feedback on the above question is a real endorsement of Google Docs as a collaborative tool. As the project could not be completed in the limited time that we had in class it made the project sharing side invaluable. All Research Student Presentation Notes and Presentations were also shared to me from the beginning so that I could track student progress on their assignments.
3. The final question that the students were asked was:
“What things did you learn most from doing the Rome Research and Presentation Task and seeing other students presenting theirs?”
Answers were in written form and can be viewed here.
Well its been a long year and a good 8 months since my last post. I sound a bit like a lapsed Catholic in a confession with the irregularity of my posts – but its been such a busy year and I now have a bit of energy and something to say about how things have been going. My last post was about how we had implemented our new Moodle site, which some of our students had requested be named MyColl, and the successes that we had experienced. The site has gone from strength to strength and feedback from a number of reputable sources show that MyColl has been one of busiest school Moodle sites in the country.
We completed an online survey in November, 9 months after we had introduced the integrated Moodle & Google Apps site to the school, which ran for about 10 days to gauge our student feedback. It ran for the period just as our senior students were preparing to and left for exams. The response rate was over 20% of the student body. The survey was anonymous though students were required to sign in via their school Google Accounts – here is a link to a parallel survey.
One of the responses from the survey was that a good proportion of our students were accessing resources from home. Our school is a regular Day School with no boarders and is only just starting on a path of teachers putting work online. To have so many students accessing the Learning Management System from home in its first year is very encouraging.
The uptake of Google Docs across the College by students in just 9 months is both surprising and also hugely encouraging. Although 25% of the students have never used Docs, 75% have had some exposure with 34% being regular users (either “Often” or “All the time”). It is anticipated that usage of Google Docs will grow more sharply in 2011 with Google’s huge on-going investment to improve the product and more staff planning to use the tool within their teaching programmes.
What feature(s) do you MOST LIKE about MyColl?
About half the students who completed the survey took the opportunity to write comments on features which they liked about the site. Here is a wordcloud that gives a visual impression of what they liked the most.
Finally, the students were asked if they would like a student area to discuss, debate, vote and engage one another on school based issues. With the advent of social forums such as facebook (currently blocked within school due to its highly distractive nature) I expected that students would rather stay away from a school based social network. However, I was pleasantly surprised at the response as you can see below. We will be launching “Student Voice” for students in early 2011.
Well those are a few of the responses from our students. As you can see another busy year ahead with a few more projects to get under way. I intend to get a post out once per month this coming year, but don’t hold me to it.
Happy New Year to all.